<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Association of Costs Lawyers | Tracey Jack | Activity</title>
	<link>https://associationofcostslawyers.co.uk/members/tracey-jack/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://associationofcostslawyers.co.uk/members/tracey-jack/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Tracey Jack.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 09:41:10 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">8ddc1d8dcf12419efbb752070d0f3790</guid>
				<title>Tracey Jack started the topic Legal Aid Group: Provision for Advocates Meetings in High Cost Matters in the forum Civil/Practice</title>
				<link>https://associationofcostslawyers.co.uk/forums/topic/legal-aid-group-provision-for-advocates-meetings-in-high-cost-matters/</link>
				<pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2024 09:24:55 +0000</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was mentioned at a seminar I attended late in 2022 that, in relation to high cost family cases, if we had provision in Court Orders for there to be an advocates meeting before all hearings then the LAA would accept that. We&#8217;ve been working on that basis before and since, however, the head of our Care Department has mentioned to me that other&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-9220"><a href="https://associationofcostslawyers.co.uk/forums/topic/legal-aid-group-provision-for-advocates-meetings-in-high-cost-matters/" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>